IP26 vs IP64
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP26 and IP64 are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 2 vs 6) and liquid protection (level 6 vs 4). IP26 is rated for > 12.5 mm — finger and powerful water jets (12.5 mm nozzle), while IP64 provides dust-tight and splashing water (all directions).
Built to withstand protection against solid objects larger than 12.5 mm and protection against powerful water jets. Water projected in powerful jets by a 12.5 mm nozzle against the enclosure from any direction shall have no harmful effects.. Classified as IEC 60529 ingress protection code IP26, it pairs solid level 2 with liquid level 6.
IP64 is dust-tight and resists splashing water from any direction. A solid outdoor-covered rating combining complete dust exclusion with splash tolerance, sitting between IP65 (jets) and IP54 (dust-protected).
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP26
2 — > 12.5 mm — Finger
IP64
6 — Dust-Tight
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP26
6 — Powerful Water Jets (12.5 mm nozzle)
IP64
4 — Splashing Water (all directions)
Dust-tight
IP26
No
IP64
Yes
Water-jet resistant
IP26
Yes
IP64
No
Submersible
IP26
No
IP64
No
Outdoor suitable
IP26
Yes
IP64
Yes
The exact difference (IP26 vs IP64)
Solid protection
IP26
Level 2 — > 12.5 mm — Finger
IP64
Level 6 — Dust-Tight
IP26 provides "> 12.5 mm — Finger" (level 2), while IP64 provides "Dust-Tight" (level 6). IP64 is 4 levels higher.
Liquid protection
IP26
Level 6 — Powerful Water Jets (12.5 mm nozzle)
IP64
Level 4 — Splashing Water (all directions)
IP26 handles 100 kPa (Powerful Water Jets (12.5 mm nozzle)), while IP64 handles 50–100 kPa (Splashing Water (all directions)). IP26 provides 2 levels more liquid protection.
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP64 offers higher overall protection than IP26. Choose IP64 for harsher environments; IP26 may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.