IP52 vs IP67
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP52 and IP67 are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 5 vs 6) and liquid protection (level 2 vs 7). IP52 is rated for dust-protected and dripping water at 15° tilt, while IP67 provides dust-tight and temporary immersion (up to 1 m).
IP52 is an ingress protection code that ensures dust-protected (limited ingress, no harmful deposit) and protection against vertically falling drops of water when the enclosure is tilted up to 15° from its normal position.. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 5 with second-digit (liquid) level 2.
IP67 is dust-tight and withstands temporary immersion in water up to 1 meter for 30 minutes. The go-to rating for outdoor and rugged devices that may be briefly submerged.
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP52
5 — Dust-Protected
IP67
6 — Dust-Tight
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP52
2 — Dripping Water at 15° Tilt
IP67
7 — Temporary Immersion (up to 1 m)
Dust-tight
IP52
Limited
IP67
Yes
Water-jet resistant
IP52
No
IP67
Yes
Submersible
IP52
No
IP67
Yes
Outdoor suitable
IP52
No
IP67
Yes
The exact difference (IP52 vs IP67)
Solid protection
IP52
Level 5 — Dust-Protected
IP67
Level 6 — Dust-Tight
IP52 provides "Dust-Protected" (level 5), while IP67 provides "Dust-Tight" (level 6). IP67 is 1 level higher.
Liquid protection
IP52
Level 2 — Dripping Water at 15° Tilt
IP67
Level 7 — Temporary Immersion (up to 1 m)
IP52 handles 0.3 mm/min drip rate (Dripping Water at 15° Tilt), while IP67 handles Hydrostatic ~10 kPa at 1 m (Temporary Immersion (up to 1 m)). IP67 provides 5 levels more liquid protection.
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP67 offers higher overall protection than IP52. Choose IP67 for harsher environments; IP52 may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.