IP29K vs IP59K
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP29K and IP59K are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 2 vs 5). IP29K is rated for > 12.5 mm — finger and high-pressure, high-temp water jets, while IP59K provides dust-protected and high-pressure, high-temp water jets.
With IP29K, an enclosure receives protection against solid objects larger than 12.5 mm and resistance to high-pressure (8–10 MPa), high-temperature (80 °C) water jets. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 2 with second-digit (liquid) level 9K.
The IP59K classification guarantees dust-protected (limited ingress, no harmful deposit) and resistance to high-pressure (8–10 MPa), high-temperature (80 °C) water jets. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 5 with second-digit (liquid) level 9K.
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP29K
2 — > 12.5 mm — Finger
IP59K
5 — Dust-Protected
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP29K
9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
IP59K
9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
Dust-tight
IP29K
No
IP59K
Limited
Water-jet resistant
IP29K
Yes
IP59K
Yes
Submersible
IP29K
Yes
IP59K
Yes
Outdoor suitable
IP29K
Yes
IP59K
Yes
The exact difference (IP29K vs IP59K)
Solid protection
IP29K
Level 2 — > 12.5 mm — Finger
IP59K
Level 5 — Dust-Protected
IP29K provides "> 12.5 mm — Finger" (level 2), while IP59K provides "Dust-Protected" (level 5). IP59K is 3 levels higher.
Liquid protection
IP29K
Level 9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
IP59K
Level 9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
Both IP29K and IP59K share the same liquid protection: High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets.
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP59K offers higher overall protection than IP29K. Choose IP59K for harsher environments; IP29K may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.