IP19K vs IP49K
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP19K and IP49K are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in solid-object protection (level 1 vs 4). IP19K is rated for > 50 mm — back of hand and high-pressure, high-temp water jets, while IP49K provides > 1 mm — small wires and high-pressure, high-temp water jets.
Under IEC 60529, IP19K specifies protection against solid objects larger than 50 mm and resistance to high-pressure (8–10 MPa), high-temperature (80 °C) water jets. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 1 with second-digit (liquid) level 9K.
Built to withstand protection against solid objects larger than 1.0 mm and resistance to high-pressure (8–10 MPa), high-temperature (80 °C) water jets. Classified as IEC 60529 ingress protection code IP49K, it pairs solid level 4 with liquid level 9K.
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP19K
1 — > 50 mm — Back of Hand
IP49K
4 — > 1 mm — Small Wires
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP19K
9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
IP49K
9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
Dust-tight
IP19K
No
IP49K
No
Water-jet resistant
IP19K
Yes
IP49K
Yes
Submersible
IP19K
Yes
IP49K
Yes
Outdoor suitable
IP19K
Yes
IP49K
Yes
The exact difference (IP19K vs IP49K)
Solid protection
IP19K
Level 1 — > 50 mm — Back of Hand
IP49K
Level 4 — > 1 mm — Small Wires
IP19K provides "> 50 mm — Back of Hand" (level 1), while IP49K provides "> 1 mm — Small Wires" (level 4). IP49K is 3 levels higher.
Liquid protection
IP19K
Level 9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
IP49K
Level 9 — High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets
Both IP19K and IP49K share the same liquid protection: High-Pressure, High-Temp Water Jets.
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IP49K offers higher overall protection than IP19K. Choose IP49K for harsher environments; IP19K may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.