IP07 vs IPX8
Head-to-head comparison of two IEC 60529 ingress protection ratings.
IP07 and IPX8 are both IEC 60529 ingress protection codes, but they differ in liquid protection (level 7 vs 8). IP07 is rated for no protection and temporary immersion (up to 1 m), while IPX8 provides no protection and continuous immersion (manufacturer-specified).
IP07 is an ingress protection code that ensures no protection against solid objects and protection against the effects of temporary immersion in water. Ingress of water in quantities causing harmful effects shall not be possible.. It is an IEC 60529 ingress protection code combining first-digit (solid) level 0 with second-digit (liquid) level 7.
IPX8 protects against continuous immersion under manufacturer-specified conditions (depth and duration), with solid protection not specified. The standard for submersible consumer electronics.
Detailed comparison
The stronger rating on each row is highlighted in emerald.
Solid protection (first digit)
IP07
0 — No Protection
IPX8
0 — No Protection
Liquid protection (second digit)
IP07
7 — Temporary Immersion (up to 1 m)
IPX8
8 — Continuous Immersion (manufacturer-specified)
Dust-tight
IP07
No
IPX8
No
Water-jet resistant
IP07
Yes
IPX8
Yes
Submersible
IP07
Yes
IPX8
Yes
Outdoor suitable
IP07
Yes
IPX8
Yes
The exact difference (IP07 vs IPX8)
Solid protection
IP07
Level 0 — No Protection
IPX8
Level 0 — No Protection
Both IP07 and IPX8 share the same solid protection: No Protection.
Liquid protection
IP07
Level 7 — Temporary Immersion (up to 1 m)
IPX8
Level 8 — Continuous Immersion (manufacturer-specified)
IP07 handles Hydrostatic ~10 kPa at 1 m (Temporary Immersion (up to 1 m)), while IPX8 handles Specified by manufacturer (Continuous Immersion (manufacturer-specified)). IPX8 provides 1 level more liquid protection.
NEMA equivalents
No direct NEMA equivalent.
No direct NEMA equivalent.
Recommendation
IPX8 offers higher overall protection than IP07. Choose IPX8 for harsher environments; IP07 may suffice for milder conditions and can be more cost-effective.